The Truth About “Perfect Prompts” on X

— Issue #25 of The Artificial Newsletter

Everyone says their prompt will save you 10 hours a week. I tested them. Here’s what actually happened.

Every week, my feed is filled with magic prompts:

“This prompt turns ChatGPT into a brutally honest advisor.”
“This prompt eliminates fluff and gives you perfect answers.”
“This one makes it write like a human.”

Thousands of reposts. Hundreds of bookmarks.
But do they really work — or just sound clever?

So, I tested four of the most viral “super prompts” making rounds on X and Reddit right now.

⚙️ Prompt #1: Absolute Mode

“Eliminate emojis, filler, hype… Prioritize blunt, directive phrasing. Speak only to underlying cognitive tier.”

What it promises:
Clarity. No fluff. Just cold, hard truth.

What it actually does:
✅ Removes unnecessary filler
✅ Makes answers concise
❌ Sometimes too robotic — kills nuance and tone
❌ Struggles with emotional or human-centered topics

Verdict: Great for data analysis, strategy docs, or product specs.
Terrible for storytelling, emails, or anything that needs empathy.

🧱 Prompt #2: The Brutally Honest Advisor

“Stop being agreeable. Act as my high-level mirror. Don’t flatter me. Challenge my thinking.”

What it promises:
A no-nonsense mentor that pushes you to think better.

What it actually does:
✅ Forces the model to be critical — surprisingly effective for brainstorming and decision-making.
✅ You’ll get “callouts” that sound like a real coach.
❌ Over time, tone feels repetitive (“You’re avoiding hard questions”).
❌ Needs tuning per topic (business vs. personal).

Verdict: Possibly the most useful mindset prompt I’ve tried — keeps you accountable and sharp.

🧩 Prompt #3: The Natural Writing Prompt

“Use simple language. Avoid AI clichés. Be direct, skip marketing fluff.”

What it promises:
To make ChatGPT write like a real human.

What it actually does:
✅ Hugely improves readability and tone.
✅ Perfect for newsletters, emails, or X posts.
❌ Needs manual context — it’s not “magic,” just a good writing rulebook.

Verdict: This is the one every creator should steal. It doesn’t change ChatGPT — it changes you.

⚡ Prompt #4: Objective Execution Mode

“Operate in factual-only mode. No emotions. No assumptions. End reply after delivering output.”

What it promises:
Zero fluff. Maximum accuracy.

What it actually does:
✅ Keeps responses grounded
✅ Excellent for research or structured writing
❌ Feels like talking to a government report
❌ Removes conversational flow entirely

Verdict: Excellent for back-end tasks (like SOPs, data cleaning, or summaries).
Not great for creative or mixed reasoning tasks.

🧠 What I Learned

Most viral prompts online fall into two categories:

Type

Goal

Works For

Fails At

“Control Prompts”

Change ChatGPT’s tone or style

Docs, analysis

Creative thinking

“Mindset Prompts”

Change your way of asking

Reflection, problem-solving

Factual precision

The real magic isn’t the prompt — it’s the user’s intention and follow-up.
The best results came when I combined both styles:

🔹 “Act as my brutally honest advisor.”
🔹 “Write with factual accuracy and simple language.”

Together, they gave me human-sounding precision — no fluff, no lies.

🎯 Try This Yourself

Ask the same question under different “prompt personalities” and compare results.
Here’s one test I ran:

Question: “How can I scale my consulting firm without diluting brand quality?”

Each prompt gave a different mindset of advice.
The brutal one challenged my assumptions.
The factual one gave data points.
The simple one rewrote it like a tweet that could go viral.

That’s the real lesson:

You don’t need one perfect prompt.
You need three perspectives that make you think differently.

🚀 Closing Thought

Everyone’s chasing “the one perfect prompt.”
The real skill is prompt strategy — knowing which persona to summon for each kind of problem.

If you’ve seen a viral prompt that claims to “revolutionize your workflow,” reply or DM me — I’ll test it live and publish the results.